Research

Research

Challenges & solutions for crossdisciplinary sense making

Crossdisciplinary Sense Making Tools

Recent Article

Led from the ITD Alliance Working Group on Toolkits & Methods

Cover page for Laursen et al 2022

Laursen, B., Vienni-Baptista, B., Bammer, G., Di Giulio, A., Paulsen, T., Robson-Williams, M., & Studer, S. (2024). Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9

View Article

CROSSDISCIPLINARY SENSE MAKING TOOLS

What tools help us combine different ways of thinking to gain insight?

Toolkits


  • Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity

    Laursen, B., Vienni-Baptista, B., Bammer, G., Di Giulio, A., Paulsen, T., Robson-Williams, M., & Studer, S. (2024). Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9

  • Toolkits encyclopedia entry

    ITD Alliance Working Group on Toolkits and Methods. (2024). Toolkits. In F. Darbellay (Ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity (pp. 533–537). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317967.ch117

  • A landscape of toolkits for inter- and transdisciplinary Research

    ITD Alliance Working Group on Toolkits & Methods. (2023). A landscape of toolkits for Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research. Global Alliance for Inter- and Transdisciplinarity. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10020000


Integration


  • Modeling varieties of integration


  • Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science

    Laursen, B. K., Gonnerman, C., & Crowley, S. J. (2021). Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 87, 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.02.004

  • Thinking with Klein about Integration

  • What is collaborative, interdisciplinary reasoning?

    Laursen, B. K. (2018). What is collaborative, interdisciplinary reasoning? The heart of interdisciplinary team science. Informing Science, 21, 75–106. http://doi.org/10.28945/4010


    (reprinted in Gaetano R Lotrecchiano & Shalini Misra (Editors). 2020. Transdisciplinary Teams and Communication. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press)


  • On the intersection of interdisciplinary studies and argumentation studies

  • Evidence for integrative discourse

    • Laursen, B. K., & O'Rourke, M. (2019). Detecting Integrative Discourse in Team Meetings. Presented at the International Transdisciplinarity Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden.
    • Laursen, B. K., & O'Rourke, M. (2018). Evidence for integrative reasoning in interdisciplinary team science. Galveston, TX.
    • Laursen, B. K., & O'Rourke, M. (2018). Humanities-based methods for the cognitive science of communication: Examples from the toolbox Dialogue project. Presented at the Cognitive Science of Communication Studies Symposium, East Lansing, MI.
  • Disciplinary diversity in teams

    O'Rourke, M., Crowley, S., Laursen, B. K., Robinson, B., & Vasko, S. E. (2019). Disciplinary Diversity in Teams: Integrative Approaches from Unidisciplinarity to Transdisciplinarity. In K. L. Hall, A. L. Vogel, & R. T. Croyle (Eds.), Strategies for Team Science Success (pp. 21–46). Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6_2


  • Explicating and negotiating bias in interdisciplinary inquiry using abductive tools.

    Laursen, B. K. (2016, May). Explicating and negotiating bias in interdisciplinary inquiry using abductive tools. Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: the 11th Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.  https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/138/

  • ‘Feeling into’ accurate, credible, and just explanations

    Laursen, B. K. (2015, December). ‘Feeling into’ accurate, credible, and just explanations: Empathy as the means to know how and why. Department of Philosophy Seventh Annual Public Proseminar Workshop, East Lansing, MI. December 5.


Sense Making


  • INTEREACH Tools Webinar Series

    For Spring 2021, I've organized a series of five monthly webinars for the INTEREACH community of practice focusing on "Boundary Spanning Tools for Research Teams." On January 12, I led the kickoff webinar with an overview of "General Principles of Tool Use." 

  • Sense making for effective health education

    Laursen, B. K. (2018, March). Sense making for effective health education. Choices Conference, Michigan Fitness Foundation, Dearborn, MI.

  • What counts as a good model?

    Laursen, B. K. (2018, June). What counts as a good model? Determining thresholds for evidence, explanations, and significance. Presented at the United States Geological Survey Eastern Water Seminar Series, Reston, VA. June 15.

  • Making sense of sense making

    Making sense of sense making: An online performance of real-time research. View archived project.


    Public philosophy (concept analysis) using a polystyrene ball, videos, blog posts, comments, and pictures.

  • Sense making in evaluation

    Laursen, B. K. (2017, February). Sense making in evaluation. EvalCafe, Western Michigan University. February 17.

  • What is a System Story?

    Laursen, B. K. (2017, April). What is a System Story? How Do I Create One? How Do I Use One? Michigan Association for Evaluation annual conference, Lansing, MI.

Back to Top

Participatory Modeling


  • Effectively including online participants in onsite meetings

    Members of the SESYNC theme “Building Resources for Complex, Action-Oriented Team Science.” (2020, March 24). Effectively including online participants in onsite meetings. I2insights.org. https://i2insights.org/2020/03/24/effective-online-plus-onsite-meetings/

  • Tools and methods in participatory modeling

    Voinov, A. A., Jenni, K., Gray, S., Kolagani, N., Glynn, P. D., Bommel, P., et al. (2018). Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job. Environmental Modelling & Software, 109, 232–255. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028

  • Twelve questions for the participatory modeling community

    Jordan, R., Gray, S., Zellner, M., Glynn, P. D., Voinov, A. A., Hedelin, B., et al. (2018). Twelve Questions for the Participatory Modeling Community. Earth's Future, 18(2), 21. http://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000841


  • Purpose, processes, partnerships, and products: 4Ps to advance participatory socio-environmental modeling

    Gray, S., Voinov, A. A., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., BenDor, T., Bommel, P., et al. (2017). Purpose, Processes, Partnerships, and Products: 4Ps to advance Participatory Socio-Environmental Modeling. Ecological Applications, 28(1), 46–61. http://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1627

EVALUATING INTERDISCIPLINARITY

How can we know if interdisciplinarity is good?

The National Center for Socio-Environmental Synthesis


  • Approaches to monitoring and evaluating interdisciplinarity: A systematic review

    AEA365 blog post compiling 5 open access products

    • Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., & Anderson, K. J. (2023). Pathway profiles: Learning from five main approaches to assessing interdisciplinarity. Research Evaluation, 32(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac036
    • Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., and Anderson, K. J. (2022). Pathways for assessing interdisciplinarity: A systematic review. Research Evaluation, 31(3): 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac013
    • Laursen, B. K., Anderson, K., and Motzer, N. (2022). Systematic review of the literature assessing interdisciplinarity from 2000 to 2019. Harvard Dataverse. V4, UNF:6:UKaEjVNGIKift5LU3ZH6HQ== [fileUNF]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/6UCNKW 
    • Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., and Anderson, K. (2020, June). Results of a systematic review show how to improve measurement of interdisciplinarity. Presented at the 11th Annual Science of Team Science Conference, Virtual. https://youtu.be/q89CcZyHfr8
  • A new methodology for evaluating integration in interdisciplinary research products

    Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., and Anderson, K. (2019, May). A new methodology for evaluating integration in interdisciplinary research products. Presented at the 10th Annual Science of Team Science Conference, Lansing, MI.


The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative


  • The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: The power of cross-disciplinary practice

    Our research community's comprehensive book about the Toolbox Dialogue Initiative.

    • Gonnerman, C., Hubbs, G., Laursen, B. K., & Malavisi, A. (2020). The power of philosophy. In M. O’Rourke, G. Hubbs, & S. H. Orzack (Eds.), The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: The power of cross-disciplinary practice (pp. 82–93). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429440014-6
    • O’Rourke, M., Hall, T. E., & Laursen, B. K. (2020). The power of dialogue (G. Hubbs, M. O’Rourke, & S. H. Orzack, Eds.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429440014-7
    • Eigenbrode, S. D., Vasko, S. E., Rinkus, M. A., Laursen, B. K., & O’Rourke, M. (2020). Future directions for the Toolbox Dialogue Initiative. In G. Hubbs, M. O’Rourke, & S. H. Orzack (Eds.), The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440014-11
  • The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: Evidence of effectiveness and new directions

    Hubbs, G., Laursen, B. K., Rinkus, M. A., Robinson, B., & Vasko, S. E. (2018, May). The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: Evidence of effectiveness and new directions. Presented at the 8th annual Science of Team Science Conference, Galveston, TX.

Back to Top

previous research

LANDSCAPE GOVERNANCE

How do we use multiple areas of expertise to ensure a landscape & its people stay healthy?


Expertise Networks


  • Assessing adaptive co-management capacity for improving the LEADER Initiative

    Pappalardo, G., B. K. Laursen, and B. Pecorino. (2014, June). Assessing adaptive co-management capacity for improving the LEADER Initiative: Findings from two Sicilian Local Action Groups, International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Hanover, Germany.

  • Sustaining complexity by evaluating expertise networks

    This was my thesis work for my joint M.S. in Environment & Resources and Forestry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.


    • Laursen, B. K. (2013, July 17). Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks: A case study from Southwest Wisconsin, USA. (M. G. Rickenbach, Ed.). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. Retrieved from http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/71938
    • Laursen, B. K. (2013, September). Sustaining complexity by evaluating expertise networks: A case study from a Driftless Area landscape. Environmental Evaluators Network Pacific Forum, Corbett, OR.
    • Laursen, B. K. (2013, July). Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks: A case study from the Driftless Area. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 

Transboundary Water Governance


  • A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts

    Walters, R., Kenzie, E., Metzger, A., Baltutis, W. J., Chakrabarti, K., Hirsch, S., and Laursen, B. K. (2019). A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: A case study from the Pilcomayo River Basin. Ecology & Society 24(2), https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10586-240209

  • Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks

    This was my thesis work for my joint M.S. in Environment & Resources and Forestry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.


    • Laursen, B. K. (2013, July 17). Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks: A case study from Southwest Wisconsin, USA. (M. G. Rickenbach, Ed.). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. Retrieved from http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/71938
    • Laursen, B. K. (2013, September). Sustaining complexity by evaluating expertise networks: A case study from a Driftless Area landscape. Environmental Evaluators Network Pacific Forum, Corbett, OR.
    • Laursen, B. K. (2013, July). Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks: A case study from the Driftless Area. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 
Back to Top

previous research

EDUCATION RESEARCH

What teaching & learning practices supercharge student growth?


Affect & Attitude


  • Commentary 9.2: Institutional and student responsibility when professionals return to interdisciplinary graduate study

    Laursen, B. (2024). Commentary 9.2: Institutional and student responsibility when professionals return to interdisciplinary graduate study. In B. Vienni-Baptista, M. van Goch, R. van Lambalgen, & K. E. Lindvig (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Practices in Higher Education: Approaches to Teaching, Researching and Collaborating (pp. 176–180). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003286004

  • Student Personal Growth & Community-Engaged Coursework

    An Assessment of CSUS 301: Community Engagement for Sustainability


    Download the report.

  • College student perceptions of animal welfare are sensitive to experiential farm tours and classroom pedagogy

    • Laursen, B. K., Siegford, J., Thorp, L., Thompson, P. B., and Rozeboom, D. (2016, July). College student perceptions of animal welfare are sensitive to experiential farm tours and classroom pedagogy. International Society for Applied Ethology, Edinburgh, Scotland.
    • Laursen, B. K., Siegford, J., Thorp, L., Thompson, P. B., and Rozeboom, D. (2016, May). College student perceptions of animal welfare are sensitive to experiential farm tours and classroom pedagogy. 4th Food Justice Workshop, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

Liberal Arts Education


  • Liberal education and effective action

    Laursen, B. K. (2020). Liberal education and effective action: A commentary. Journal of General Education 68(3-4), 307-310.

  • The liberal arts endeavor

    • Long, C. P. and Laursen, B. K. (2020). The liberal arts endeavor: Valuing peer review. Journal of General Education 68(3-4), vii-xi.
    • Long, C. P. and Laursen, B. K. (2020). The liberal arts endeavor: Celebrating a quarter center of University Studies at Portland State. Journal of General Education 67(1-2), v-viii.
    • Long, C. P. and Laursen, B. K. (2020). The liberal arts endeavor: Enacting values in general education reform. Journal of General Education 66(3-4), v-vii.
  • The sina qua non is Christ: A synthesized model of excellent education

    Laursen, B. K. (2014). The sina qua non is Christ: A synthesized model of excellent education. Journal for the Society of Classical Learning, VII, 26–28.

Back to Top

VARIOUS EXPLORATIONS

Dabbling in this and that

Environmental History


  • Standing in line, standing in a legacy

    Laursen, B. K. (2014, March 1). Standing in Line, Standing in a Legacy: an Environmental History of the Babcock Hall Dairy Store. The Wisconsin Magazine of History, 97(3), 3–15.

  • Summer fieldwork

    Laursen, B. K. (2012, November). Summer fieldwork. Segment in the radio show, Science as storytelling, scientists as storytellers. Produced by Kaitlin Rienzo-Stack. The Perpetual Notion Machine. WORT FM 89.9. Madison, WI. November 28. http://tinyurl.com/SciStory


Methods



Forest Hydrology


  • Stable water isotopes suggest sub‐canopy water recycling in a northern forested catchment

    Green, M. B., Laursen, B. K., Campbell, J. L., McGuire, K. J., & Kelsey, E. P. (2015). Stable water isotopes suggest sub‐canopy water recycling in a northern forested catchment. Hydrological Processes, 29(25), 5193–5202. http://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10706



Environmental Stewardship


  • Stewardship meets complexity theory

    Laursen, B. K. (2012, March 15). Stewardship meets complexity theory. (D. Bouma, Ed.) The Au Sable Institute for Environmental Studies. March 15.

  • Water quality monitoring is addictive; beware!

    Laursen, B. K. (2010, Winter). Water quality monitoring is addictive; beware! Merrymeeting News. Friends of Merrymeeting Bay.

Back to Top
Share by: