Research
Challenges & solutions for crossdisciplinary sense making
Crossdisciplinary Sense Making Tools
Recent Article
Led from the ITD Alliance Working Group on Toolkits & Methods
Laursen, B.,
Vienni-Baptista, B., Bammer, G., Di Giulio, A., Paulsen, T., Robson-Williams, M., & Studer, S. (2024). Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9
CROSSDISCIPLINARY SENSE MAKING TOOLS
Toolkits
-
Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity
Laursen, B., Vienni-Baptista, B., Bammer, G., Di Giulio, A., Paulsen, T., Robson-Williams, M., & Studer, S. (2024). Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9
-
Toolkits encyclopedia entry
ITD Alliance Working Group on Toolkits and Methods. (2024). Toolkits. In F. Darbellay (Ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity (pp. 533–537). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317967.ch117
-
A landscape of toolkits for inter- and transdisciplinary Research
ITD Alliance Working Group on Toolkits & Methods. (2023). A landscape of toolkits for Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research. Global Alliance for Inter- and Transdisciplinarity. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10020000
Integration
-
Modeling varieties of integration
-
Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science
Laursen, B. K., Gonnerman, C., & Crowley, S. J. (2021). Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 87, 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.02.004
-
Thinking with Klein about Integration
-
What is collaborative, interdisciplinary reasoning?
Laursen, B. K. (2018). What is collaborative, interdisciplinary reasoning? The heart of interdisciplinary team science. Informing Science, 21, 75–106. http://doi.org/10.28945/4010
(reprinted in Gaetano R Lotrecchiano & Shalini Misra (Editors). 2020. Transdisciplinary Teams and Communication. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press)
-
On the intersection of interdisciplinary studies and argumentation studies
-
Evidence for integrative discourse
- Laursen, B. K., & O'Rourke, M. (2019). Detecting Integrative Discourse in Team Meetings. Presented at the International Transdisciplinarity Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Laursen, B. K., & O'Rourke, M. (2018). Evidence for integrative reasoning in interdisciplinary team science. Galveston, TX.
- Laursen, B. K., & O'Rourke, M. (2018). Humanities-based methods for the cognitive science of communication: Examples from the toolbox Dialogue project. Presented at the Cognitive Science of Communication Studies Symposium, East Lansing, MI.
-
Disciplinary diversity in teams
O'Rourke, M., Crowley, S., Laursen, B. K., Robinson, B., & Vasko, S. E. (2019). Disciplinary Diversity in Teams: Integrative Approaches from Unidisciplinarity to Transdisciplinarity. In K. L. Hall, A. L. Vogel, & R. T. Croyle (Eds.), Strategies for Team Science Success (pp. 21–46). Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6_2
-
Explicating and negotiating bias in interdisciplinary inquiry using abductive tools.
Laursen, B. K. (2016, May). Explicating and negotiating bias in interdisciplinary inquiry using abductive tools. Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: the 11th Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, Windsor, Ontario, Canada. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/138/
-
‘Feeling into’ accurate, credible, and just explanations
Laursen, B. K. (2015, December). ‘Feeling into’ accurate, credible, and just explanations: Empathy as the means to know how and why. Department of Philosophy Seventh Annual Public Proseminar Workshop, East Lansing, MI. December 5.
Sense Making
-
INTEREACH Tools Webinar Series
For Spring 2021, I've organized a series of five monthly webinars for the INTEREACH community of practice focusing on "Boundary Spanning Tools for Research Teams." On January 12, I led the kickoff webinar with an overview of "General Principles of Tool Use."
- View the recording
- Download the slides
- To download the DIY Boundary Spanning Field Notebook, sign up to get a link.
-
Sense making for effective health education
Laursen, B. K. (2018, March). Sense making for effective health education. Choices Conference, Michigan Fitness Foundation, Dearborn, MI.
-
What counts as a good model?
Laursen, B. K. (2018, June). What counts as a good model? Determining thresholds for evidence, explanations, and significance. Presented at the United States Geological Survey Eastern Water Seminar Series, Reston, VA. June 15.
-
Making sense of sense making
Making sense of sense making: An online performance of real-time research. View archived project.
Public philosophy (concept analysis) using a polystyrene ball, videos, blog posts, comments, and pictures.
-
Sense making in evaluation
Laursen, B. K. (2017, February). Sense making in evaluation. EvalCafe, Western Michigan University. February 17.
-
What is a System Story?
Laursen, B. K. (2017, April). What is a System Story? How Do I Create One? How Do I Use One? Michigan Association for Evaluation annual conference, Lansing, MI.
Participatory Modeling
-
Effectively including online participants in onsite meetings
Members of the SESYNC theme “Building Resources for Complex, Action-Oriented Team Science.” (2020, March 24). Effectively including online participants in onsite meetings. I2insights.org. https://i2insights.org/2020/03/24/effective-online-plus-onsite-meetings/
-
Tools and methods in participatory modeling
Voinov, A. A., Jenni, K., Gray, S., Kolagani, N., Glynn, P. D., Bommel, P., et al. (2018). Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job. Environmental Modelling & Software, 109, 232–255. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028
-
Twelve questions for the participatory modeling community
Jordan, R., Gray, S., Zellner, M., Glynn, P. D., Voinov, A. A., Hedelin, B., et al. (2018). Twelve Questions for the Participatory Modeling Community. Earth's Future, 18(2), 21. http://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000841
-
Purpose, processes, partnerships, and products: 4Ps to advance participatory socio-environmental modeling
Gray, S., Voinov, A. A., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., BenDor, T., Bommel, P., et al. (2017). Purpose, Processes, Partnerships, and Products: 4Ps to advance Participatory Socio-Environmental Modeling. Ecological Applications, 28(1), 46–61. http://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1627
EVALUATING INTERDISCIPLINARITY
The National Center for Socio-Environmental Synthesis
-
Approaches to monitoring and evaluating interdisciplinarity: A systematic review
AEA365 blog post compiling 5 open access products
- Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., & Anderson, K. J. (2023). Pathway profiles: Learning from five main approaches to assessing interdisciplinarity. Research Evaluation, 32(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac036
- Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., and Anderson, K. J. (2022). Pathways for assessing interdisciplinarity: A systematic review. Research Evaluation, 31(3): 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac013
- Laursen, B. K., Anderson, K., and Motzer, N. (2022). Systematic review of the literature assessing interdisciplinarity from 2000 to 2019. Harvard Dataverse. V4, UNF:6:UKaEjVNGIKift5LU3ZH6HQ== [fileUNF]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/6UCNKW
- Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., and Anderson, K. (2020, June). Results of a systematic review show how to improve measurement of interdisciplinarity. Presented at the 11th Annual Science of Team Science Conference, Virtual. https://youtu.be/q89CcZyHfr8
-
A new methodology for evaluating integration in interdisciplinary research products
Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., and Anderson, K. (2019, May). A new methodology for evaluating integration in interdisciplinary research products. Presented at the 10th Annual Science of Team Science Conference, Lansing, MI.
The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative
-
The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: The power of cross-disciplinary practice
Our research community's comprehensive book about the Toolbox Dialogue Initiative.
- Gonnerman, C., Hubbs, G., Laursen, B. K., & Malavisi, A. (2020). The power of philosophy. In M. O’Rourke, G. Hubbs, & S. H. Orzack (Eds.), The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: The power of cross-disciplinary practice (pp. 82–93). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429440014-6
- O’Rourke, M., Hall, T. E., & Laursen, B. K. (2020). The power of dialogue (G. Hubbs, M. O’Rourke, & S. H. Orzack, Eds.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429440014-7
- Eigenbrode, S. D., Vasko, S. E., Rinkus, M. A., Laursen, B. K., & O’Rourke, M. (2020). Future directions for the Toolbox Dialogue Initiative. In G. Hubbs, M. O’Rourke, & S. H. Orzack (Eds.), The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440014-11
-
The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: Evidence of effectiveness and new directions
Hubbs, G., Laursen, B. K., Rinkus, M. A., Robinson, B., & Vasko, S. E. (2018, May). The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: Evidence of effectiveness and new directions. Presented at the 8th annual Science of Team Science Conference, Galveston, TX.
previous research
LANDSCAPE GOVERNANCE
How do we use multiple areas of expertise to ensure a landscape & its people stay healthy?
Expertise Networks
-
Assessing adaptive co-management capacity for improving the LEADER Initiative
Pappalardo, G., B. K. Laursen, and B. Pecorino. (2014, June). Assessing adaptive co-management capacity for improving the LEADER Initiative: Findings from two Sicilian Local Action Groups, International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Hanover, Germany.
-
Sustaining complexity by evaluating expertise networks
This was my thesis work for my joint M.S. in Environment & Resources and Forestry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
- Laursen, B. K. (2013, July 17). Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks: A case study from Southwest Wisconsin, USA. (M. G. Rickenbach, Ed.). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. Retrieved from http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/71938
- Laursen, B. K. (2013, September). Sustaining complexity by evaluating expertise networks: A case study from a Driftless Area landscape. Environmental Evaluators Network Pacific Forum, Corbett, OR.
- Laursen, B. K. (2013, July). Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks: A case study from the Driftless Area. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Transboundary Water Governance
-
A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts
Walters, R., Kenzie, E., Metzger, A., Baltutis, W. J., Chakrabarti, K., Hirsch, S., and Laursen, B. K. (2019). A systems thinking approach for eliciting mental models from visual boundary objects in hydropolitical contexts: A case study from the Pilcomayo River Basin. Ecology & Society 24(2), https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10586-240209
-
Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks
This was my thesis work for my joint M.S. in Environment & Resources and Forestry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
- Laursen, B. K. (2013, July 17). Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks: A case study from Southwest Wisconsin, USA. (M. G. Rickenbach, Ed.). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. Retrieved from http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/71938
- Laursen, B. K. (2013, September). Sustaining complexity by evaluating expertise networks: A case study from a Driftless Area landscape. Environmental Evaluators Network Pacific Forum, Corbett, OR.
- Laursen, B. K. (2013, July). Sustaining multifunctional landscapes through expertise networks: A case study from the Driftless Area. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
previous research
EDUCATION RESEARCH
What teaching & learning practices supercharge student growth?
Affect & Attitude
-
Commentary 9.2: Institutional and student responsibility when professionals return to interdisciplinary graduate study
Laursen, B. (2024). Commentary 9.2: Institutional and student responsibility when professionals return to interdisciplinary graduate study. In B. Vienni-Baptista, M. van Goch, R. van Lambalgen, & K. E. Lindvig (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Practices in Higher Education: Approaches to Teaching, Researching and Collaborating (pp. 176–180). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003286004
-
Student Personal Growth & Community-Engaged Coursework
-
College student perceptions of animal welfare are sensitive to experiential farm tours and classroom pedagogy
- Laursen, B. K., Siegford, J., Thorp, L., Thompson, P. B., and Rozeboom, D. (2016, July). College student perceptions of animal welfare are sensitive to experiential farm tours and classroom pedagogy. International Society for Applied Ethology, Edinburgh, Scotland.
- Laursen, B. K., Siegford, J., Thorp, L., Thompson, P. B., and Rozeboom, D. (2016, May). College student perceptions of animal welfare are sensitive to experiential farm tours and classroom pedagogy. 4th Food Justice Workshop, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Liberal Arts Education
-
Liberal education and effective action
Laursen, B. K. (2020). Liberal education and effective action: A commentary. Journal of General Education 68(3-4), 307-310.
-
The liberal arts endeavor
- Long, C. P. and Laursen, B. K. (2020). The liberal arts endeavor: Valuing peer review. Journal of General Education 68(3-4), vii-xi.
- Long, C. P. and Laursen, B. K. (2020). The liberal arts endeavor: Celebrating a quarter center of University Studies at Portland State. Journal of General Education 67(1-2), v-viii.
- Long, C. P. and Laursen, B. K. (2020). The liberal arts endeavor: Enacting values in general education reform. Journal of General Education 66(3-4), v-vii.
-
The sina qua non is Christ: A synthesized model of excellent education
Laursen, B. K. (2014). The sina qua non is Christ: A synthesized model of excellent education. Journal for the Society of Classical Learning, VII, 26–28.
VARIOUS EXPLORATIONS
Environmental History
-
Standing in line, standing in a legacy
Laursen, B. K. (2014, March 1). Standing in Line, Standing in a Legacy: an Environmental History of the Babcock Hall Dairy Store. The Wisconsin Magazine of History, 97(3), 3–15.
-
Summer fieldwork
Laursen, B. K. (2012, November). Summer fieldwork. Segment in the radio show, Science as storytelling, scientists as storytellers. Produced by Kaitlin Rienzo-Stack. The Perpetual Notion Machine. WORT FM 89.9. Madison, WI. November 28. http://tinyurl.com/SciStory
Methods
-
Needs assessment
- Laursen, B. K. (2015, November). More than just a needs assessment: Putting the analysis back in swot analysis to find the best fit between your program and the situation. American Evaluation Association National Conference, Chicago, IL.
- Laursen, B. K. (2014, July 3). How to evaluate the situation, not just the program: It’s complex! AEA365.org, July 3. http://aea365.org/blog/bethany-laursen-on-how-to-evaluate-the- situation-not-just-the-program-its-complex/
-
Social Network Analysis (SNA)
- Laursen, B. K. (2015, May). Social network analysis: Use as a systems tool when evaluating collaboration capacity. University of Colorado-Denver School of Public Affairs. May 13.
- Laursen, B. K. (2018, February 14). What else can you do with SNA besides SNA? AEA365.org, February 14. http://aea365.org/blog/sna-tig-week-what-else-can-you-do-with-sna- besides-sna-by-bethany-laursen/
- Laursen, B. K. (2015, July 21). Defining the standard for ‘good’ when using social network analysis as an evaluation tool. AEA365.org, July 21. http://aea365.org/blog/sna-tig-week-bethany- laursen-on-defining-the-standard-for-good-when-using-social-network-analysis-as-an- evaluation-tool/
- Laursen, B. K. (2013, September). Easy SNA (for evaluating modular adhocracies). Environmental Evaluators Network Pacific Forum, Corbett, OR.
- Laursen, B. K. (2013, April). Social network analysis: A tutorial for Ph.D. students. School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
- Laursen, B. K. (2012, April). Social network analysis: How conservation connects with Kevin Bacon. People for Conservation and Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison. April 11.
Forest Hydrology
-
Stable water isotopes suggest sub‐canopy water recycling in a northern forested catchment
Green, M. B., Laursen, B. K., Campbell, J. L., McGuire, K. J., & Kelsey, E. P. (2015). Stable water isotopes suggest sub‐canopy water recycling in a northern forested catchment. Hydrological Processes, 29(25), 5193–5202. http://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10706
Environmental Stewardship
-
Stewardship meets complexity theory
Laursen, B. K. (2012, March 15). Stewardship meets complexity theory. (D. Bouma, Ed.) The Au Sable Institute for Environmental Studies. March 15.
-
Water quality monitoring is addictive; beware!
Laursen, B. K. (2010, Winter). Water quality monitoring is addictive; beware! Merrymeeting News. Friends of Merrymeeting Bay.